May 15, 2013
How Dumb People Become Successful
After a few years in the business world, something occurred to me. I realized that the majority of the people I met in business were astonishingly stupid.
Years later I was sitting around a bar with a couple of my agency colleagues. We had won a very important piece of business from a world class client. We were working with the very top people at the client and we were astounded by their shallowness.
A few drinks into the evening one of my colleagues turned to me and said, "I keep thinking that some day we'll meet the smart ones."
At that moment I recalled a conversation I had had years earlier. A friend introduced me to a business concept he called "achieving orbit."
With enough energy, a satellite will escape the gravitational pull of earth and will achieve orbit. Once it achieves orbit, it operates on its own. It will circle under its own power for years. And the only way to knock it down is to get in its way.
Businesses are like this, too, he claimed. After a certain period of success, they can achieve orbit and stay successful without much added energy.
Many companies are powered by products or services initiated years or even decades ago. And barring a horrible accident, they will stay in orbit. They persevere largely on inertia.
That's why all the monkeys running around having meetings and writing memos really aren't doing that much harm. It's why clueless managers really can't do too much damage. It's why all the CEOs and COOs buzzing around in their golf carts usually aren't fatal.
Of course, there are some industries, like technology, that need constant updating. But think about the market leaders in automobiles, food, soda, beer, fast food, dairy, snacks, candy, paper towels, toasters...for the most part, the market leaders today were the market leaders 30 years ago.
From time to time there come along some people who are so stupid that they knock a successful company out of orbit. But mostly, orbiting companies consist of people running around in circles pretending to make contributions. As long as they don't mess with the color of the box, or build a 3-wheeler, or change the flavor to grape, they usually can't screw things up too badly.
Businesses are successful in spite of all these monkeys, not because of them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
19 comments:
Lol!
I once worked with a client who claimed that it was mostly better to just sit and wait rather than make a decision. This was just in case he did something that might rock the boat and upset things.
You could of course turn your argument around Bob and say that businesses continue to be successful in spite of all the dodgy advertising that is foisted on them by agencies!
Word!
True, Bob. It takes a long time for the momentum of leadership to dissipate. The momentum keeps companies moving until after the "monkeys" have gone—those who engineered the conditions for slow, almost imperceptible decline have likely retired before anyone recognises a problem. And such slow, systemic decline is hard to reverse.
If we leave tech companies aside—not forgetting, of course, that it is a growing sector of world economies—it's true that many of the big names of 30 years ago still maintain their leadership today. But extend the timeline to forty years, and the pattern looks different.
Take cars. The big names like Toyota or Honda were smaller players. Kia and Hyundai were almost unheard of. Major global players, dominated by US multinationals, had a grip on many developed markets. Arguably, that span of forty years has allowed a number of players to rise, peak and enter that long decline of squandered opportunity. And NOT acting has forced once-clear leaders into an unseemly share battle with usurpers.
Yes, Kellogg and General Mills lead in cereals. But what happens when more people eat breakfast out of home? Kellogg leads in kids cereals, but what happens when tehre are fewer kids Yes, McDonalds still leads handsomely in fast-food, but it has found the need to extend into coffee in many places, to compete with companies like Starbucks. (And by the way, thirty years ago Starbucks had six stores.)
You're right, though. On a day-today level, marketers can seldom stop a brand in its tracks—arguably, even Coca-Cola emerged from the New Coke episode stronger.
On the other hand, just because momentum is powerful doesn't mean you don't need to manage it. Steering the juggernaut toward opportunity and away from oblivion takes active management decisions. These often sit above the level of new flavours, new packaging, even new "positioning". Managers are just as capable of getting them wrong as getting them right—Kodak and IBM, respectively.
"Monkeys", as you call them, can mess things up. But generally they make their bad decisions in response to bigger problems. And the slow decline is simply hastened, not caused.
This is like the brand equivalent of the Peter principle:
The Peter Principle is a proposition that states that the members of an organization where promotion is based on achievement, success, and merit, will eventually be promoted beyond their level of ability. The principle is commonly phrased, "Employees tend to rise to their level of incompetence."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle
The agency I worked for had just pickled up a new client. In our first meeting with the brand manager he told us "This brand is over 100 years old, if you think we are going to F_ _ _ this up you're wrong. We are going to do the same thing as we did last year"
I think at this point in time that brand is now a minor consideration in the segment.
I go to see everyday some web pages and sites to read articles,
but this web site gives quality based writing.
Also visit my blog: book of ra android app
Too many people's knowledge of business, like their knowledge of the law or of science, comes from movies. Screenwriters often know nothing of business. My experience suggests it is nothing short of a miracle when anything in business is done well.
Very astute Bob. There is always the lower 20% at risk which is why there are many craft beer success stories for example. You can't out Bub/Coors/Miller in the mass production game. But you can beat the smaller often premium segment with better stuff. There is plenty of mass produced/mass consumed crap that will never die. Until someone dies from it then it can go away. See Owens Corning.
BTW does this explain all the shitty ad work done over and over by the same big agencies? Does it mean the clients are dumb? The agencies? or both?
You must have been thinking about PEPSI for this one, Bob!
Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets
I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter
updates. I've been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this. Please let me know if you run into anything. I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates.
Also visit my blog post ... www.forcutie.com
How does TWBA hold onto the Pepsi account? Seriously.
A cesspool pumping is the major take into account typical septic
program. Chemicals should 't be flushed down the particular drain.
Here is my site - agencja detektywistyczna warszawa
With rеgards to eaѕier ., there is your plotted cοѕts plus the
uncontrolled priceѕ thiѕ jerk all thе waу up stealthіly using us аll thoroughly not
аwaгe. Τo illustrate, chаnces are you'll are up against having a to search a good poor comparable with your family group or even replace the particular pipes in the house. Your vehicle might possibly reduce and will need primary repairs or simply anyone or maybe all your family fellow member may perhaps drop sick wanting speedy medical help. Every one of relax and take a cost within your price range and you may necessitate immediate money in order to wave you will throughout before your next fast cash. Web sites comfortable pay day loans for helping people manage cheaply upsetting predicaments.
makes awesome grades by complementing the ideal bank considering the purchaser in desire. All of us recognize the importance from working with loan companies who ? re responsible, competent as well as ethical. Most of us carry too much effort security scanning banking institutions pertaining to proficiency in advance of for example individuals within our multilevel. Barstools2u . com offers the best podium so you might go for an appropriate mortgage lender dependant on your unique demands.
Here is my weblog kredyty przez internet
In the case of create, you'll find the actual structured costs plus the sudden expenditures that will slip upward stealthily taking usa completely uninformed. Just like, you may experience the need to visit a strong poor in comparison together with spouse and children or maybe replace typically the water system in your own home. Car could break down and can involve important auto repairs and / or one or perhaps your family person may perhaps slide unwell wanting instantaneous medical attention. Every one of go on a cost in your expense plan and you will need pressing profit to make sure you hold most people finished before future short term. We provide simple online payday loans to support customers command money wise upsetting conditions.
makes awesome grades from complimenting a good financial institution with all the consumer inside want. Many of us know the benefits about utilizing loan creditors who definitely are dependable, qualified along with moral. People take lots of time security scanning banks for the purpose of experience in advance of like all of them within network. Barstools2u . com offers the ideal console to decide upon a proper bank in line with your distinct requirements.
Here is my web-site :: pozyczki prywatne
It's not just 'smarts' that make a difference - personaliity does, too.
A colleague and I once worked out a simple segmentation of clients, in a four box matrix. (I know you like simple analyses, so I hope you like this one). The two axes are: vertically, 'smart - dumb' and horizontally, 'nasty - nice'.
"Smart-nice' is a delight to work with, great things are possible. All too few of these.
'Smart-nasty' is a challenge, but keeps you on your toes. There are more of these.
'Dumb-nice' bring out your mothering instincts, just to stop them from screwing things up. Their hearts are in the right place, they're open to ideas (as long as they're properly explained). They tend to be the largest segment.
The real problem children are the 'dumb-nasty' quadrant. They can't see that you're trying to help them, and just want to screw you over, regardless. I've only had two of these in a whole career, but they were absolute nightmares to deal with. Surprisingly, their colleagues didn't always recognise this. They just saw them as 'tough negotiators', not the dumb, destructive arseholes they really were. Usually some deep- seated sense of personal inadequacy here. (Short people are over-represented).
There are two industries that I've had the fortune of serving that this behavior seems to be the norm.
I've generally found casinos to be the absolute worst. Guys who make decisions in casinos seem to think their business success is owed their prescience and acumen - not the fact that their business model is predicated on a mathematically stealing money and that the law prevents competitors from opening up and stealing their business. If there's great casino advertising, I sure haven't seen it.
Banks suffer from a similar problem. It amazes me how bank managers capable of extended vision on long-term views in managing financial assets, but have no ability to apply the same skill set to their own brand. The end goal for most of the higher-ups I've worked with in the banking industry is to survive long enough to get bought out by Wells Fargo. That's a mindset that's as conducive to orbit as it gets.
Generally I do not read article on blogs, however
I would like to say that this write-up very forced
me to take a look at and do so! Your writing taste has been amazed
me. Thanks, very nice article.
Also visit my webpage; book of ra tricks buch
Post a Comment