June 25, 2015
Thank God For Marketing Experts
Here at the Ketel One Conference Center of The Ad Contrarian Worldwide Headquarters, we have finally realized that there are two kinds of marketing and advertising people in the world.
There are Experts, and there are Schmucks Like Us (SLUs).
The Experts are much more important than SLUs because Experts are not only smarter than us, they're smarter than the facts.
You see, we SLUs see a fact and we assume it means something. But the Experts see a fact and they know it means exactly the opposite.
Here's an example.
Nielsen just released its Total Audience Report for the first quarter of 2015. It shows that 96% of video viewing in the US is done on a television and 4% is done on a PC.
To Schmucks Like Us this might suggest that television is kicking the living shit out of PC viewing.
But not to Experts. Experts and their Expert friends don't need to read reports. They go to conferences and write books and articles and they explain to each other -- and lecture to us -- that TV is dead. They're smarter than the facts.
Here's another example:
Schmucks Like Us would look at this chart and assume that because radio reaches a higher percent of Americans every week than any other medium, it must be pretty popular. Ha! Thank goodness we have experts to explain to us that radio, too, is dead.
I think it's time that Schmucks Like Us stop reading reports and relying on facts. Not if we ever expect to become experts.
(And don't forget, there's a lot more for Schmucks Like Us here.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
However, if you trend usage from week to week, you'll see that rates are decreasing by decimal places! Thus, TV and radio are dead! :)
If you read a calendar and see that days are passing, your life span is decreasing by each of those days. Which means, by this tortured logic, you're dead. ;)
In the long run, as a great man once (supposedly) said, we are all dead.
That radio chart says total audience, when in fact that is ADULTS only... TV has more total audience 2+ or 12+.
Without detracting from the overall point - would be better to see breakdown by program access.rather than device. Eg this doesn't account for online video access (YT, Netflix et Al) via tv vs broadcast etc. Can't see link to original research on my mobile so not certain of categorisation.
Splitting digital by Smartphone/PC/Tablet is like splitting TV by Cable/Satellite/Broadcast. Yeah, if you divide a channel by 3, it doesn't look as good anymore. Shocking.
You wrote: "Yeah, if you divide a channel by 3, it doesn't look as good anymore. Shocking."
If you're referring to the Weekly Reach (% of Population) chart, your comment is off base. Affirm this by adding up the 3 smartphone, pc, tablet). The total is somewhere around 150%. That doesn't work for me, but feel free to use this number in your next Expert presentation. :)
Post a Comment